Thursday, November 28, 2024

What did Abel understand?

At this time of year, it’s good to pause and reflect on our many blessings. One of the things I’m very thankful for is the opportunity to serve with the Biblical Resource Group of Ethnos360. In addition to working on doctrinal papers for the mission, the Biblical Resource Group also responds to questions from our missionaries. An interesting question that came our way recently concerned the sacrifice of Abel in Genesis 4. Commenting on Abel’s offering, the writer of Hebrews noted: “By faith Abel offered to God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, through which he obtained witness that he was righteous...” (Heb. 11:4).

It’s often said that hindsight is 20/20. From our perspective, we can see that many sacrifices in the Old Testament, including Abel’s, were foreshadows of what Christ would accomplish on the cross of Calvary. But did Abel understand what Christ would do at the cross, so far in the future from his own time? That was the question this missionary wanted us to answer.

Some assert that Old Testament saints looked forward to the cross in the same way we now look back to it. However, this simplistic perspective raises significant questions. Did they truly understand the person of Christ and the significance of His death on the cross?

Some theologians, who minimize distinctions in God’s Word, argue that salvation has always been identical in every era. They often assert that the conscious object of the faith of Old Testament saints was Christ Himself. For example, Charles Hodge wrote: “It was not mere faith or trust in God, or simple piety, which was required, but faith in the promised Redeemer… The covenant of grace, or plan of salvation, … has always had the same promise, the same Redeemer, and the same condition of membership, namely, faith in the Son of God as the Savior of the world.”

However, the New Testament paints a different picture. Acts 17:30 refers to the Old Testament era as “times of ignorance” compared to the greater revelation given in the New Testament. This suggests that Old Testament believers did not have a clear understanding of the person and work of Christ before the cross.

The understanding of the average Israelite concerning the Messiah during Jesus’ earthly ministry was quite limited. For instance, when Jesus spoke of His impending death, Peter rebuked Him. The disciples believed that Jesus was the Messiah but did not grasp that He would die. If they failed to see Messiah’s death when looking back at Isaiah 53, how could the average Old Testament saint have understood that Messiah would die?

Because of Calvary,

Bob

* * *

Astounding Facts about the Exodus

How many people were there?

According to Numbers 1:45-46 there were more than 600,000 fighting men. Add to that an equal number of women, plus an average of four children per family (remember, the Egyptians were afraid because the Israelites were multiplying so rapidly, Exodus 1:7-10), and the population looks like this:

Men..................... 600,000
Women............... 600,000
Children........... 2,400,000
Total................. 3,600,000

How long a column would that make?

Marching 50 abreast, it would stretch for 40 miles into the desert. At a modest pace of 2 ½ miles per hour, the people would require more than 16 hours to pass by the same point.

How much food and water did the people require?

Just to provide the minimum ration of food and water for the people (not including provisions for their animals) would take the equivalent of 30 boxcars of food and 300 tank cars of water every day of their 40 year journey.

And my God shall supply all your need according to His riches in glory by Christ Jesus. –Phil. 4:19

 

Friday, November 1, 2024

Interpreting God’s Word

With the arrival of November, we look forward to Thanksgiving. We certainly have much to be thankful for. I am grateful that I only have to endure those annoying campaign ads for a few more days. I am also thankful that of the three hurricanes which made landfall in Florida, only one affected us in Central Florida. Even though the eye of Hurricane Milton came close to us, we experienced no significant damage to our property. I am thankful that Milton spared my fall garden for the most part, though I did have to replace a couple of tomato plants. Finally, I am thankful that the end of November also marks the end of hurricane season here.

The Biblical Resource Group of Ethnos360 continues to produce doctrinal papers. Our latest paper is titled "Key Principles of Bible Interpretation." It has four main sections:

1.      Interpreting God's Word

2.      Viewing Israel and the Church

3.      Understanding God's Purposes in History

4.      Embracing the Freeness of God's Grace

The paper begins with the following purpose statement:

This paper will explore some key principles of Bible interpretation, an area of study known as hermeneutics. Hermeneutics provides the rules and principles that guide us in correctly interpreting the Bible. It acts as a bridge, connecting the world of the Bible with our own. A correct understanding of Scripture helps us apply God's Word to our lives today.

The Biblical Resource Group has produced 27 doctrinal papers covering various topics such as Salvation, Calvinism, End Times, Bible Interpretation, and Theistic Evolution. Several people outside of Ethnos360 have asked how they might get access to these papers. The original doctrinal papers contain information that is only pertinent to our missionaries. However, we recognize that these papers could be an invaluable resource to a broader audience. Therefore, we revised the papers to accommodate that broader audience and reposted the 27 papers on the website of Sanford Bible Church for all to access. The web link to those papers is: https://www.sanfordbiblechurch.org/Resources.

If you go to the main webpage of Sanford Bible Church, click on "Resources." Then click on "A Collection of Doctrinal Papers." We hope you find them helpful.

Because of Calvary,

Bob

* * *

Allegorical Interpretation

The faultiest style of teaching is to corrupt the meaning of scripture, and to drag its reluctant utterance to our own will, making scriptural mysteries out of our own imaginations.

–St. Jerome (347-420 A.D.)